Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Vintner's avatar

Brexit has always depended on an abundance of slogans, clichés and religious-like beliefs, along with an almost complete absence of facts and scrutiny.

I know it's a bit of cliché also to lay the blame at the door of the UK's news media. But if not them then whose job is it to scrutinise, challenge challenge with actual facts (rather than "he said, she said" gossip and opinion), and hold to account on behalf of the public... and report to the public?

In any interview, when anyone mentions the benefits of Brexit, how often is the interviewee asked for real examples of the supposed benefits, of a comprehensive list of them?

Expand full comment

No posts